
March 30, 2025 – Change is a good thing
I missed blogging last week. I parked this weekly commitment to tend to other “things to do” that took precedent to my personal and professional reflections. I’m not sure if it was the best thing to do. Blogging has been something that I’ve been doing since I left teaching in K-12 in 2010. I would not have considered myself a good reader or writer. They were not my strengths is school, but interestingly I pursued a career that demands reading and writing. What is that all about? I often scratch my head at that notion, but here I am and I love it.
I mentioned in blogs before that I’ve tried a daily blog (like a couple of people I know) and I have landed at a weekly blog post. Now that I was able to reconnect with my old WordPress site, I am maintaining two blog posts per week, but it aches me when I’m unable to get to my weekly blog posts. Much like the experience of the students I teach, missing out on a regular routine of blogging, it’s is really hard to get back to the blogging process. However, as I reflect on last week, I am realizing that the brain/mind can only handle so much at a time.
Compassion, empathy, and kindness to self and others goes a long way for the learner and the teacher. This thinking brings me to my EDUC 201 class. They have been provoking my thinking (and being) as an educator in many ways. This year is my first time teaching this class in person. Last year, I taught the course online. That was my first time teaching the course. My first learning is, teaching undergraduate, graduate, and teacher education programs are very different and require a different approach or pedagogy from me (I believe).
Of course this idea of teaching differently for different courses makes sense, as well as teaching differently from year to year because whomever is in your class will be different. So, if you teach with “students at the centre” and are responsive to those in the room, you make decisions as to how the class will be delivered. That said, I am a person who likes to teach what I think is effective and what I want to learn about. In all of my classes, I am focused on equity, curriculum as policy, and decolonization. Within that framework, I am interested in activating teacher agency, student learning experiences, and educational leadership.
A couple of weeks ago, in EDUC 201, we engaged in a “fishbowl” activity where I was the learner who was making my “learning public.” We are reading Shafir and Dugan’s (2021) Street Data and in Chapter 7, it talked about professional learning and the teacher making their learning public to their peers to show their uncertainty and seek help and insight from their peers for support in a given situation. What a vulnerable suggestion from the book and personally, I have never witnessed or participated in such a professional learning activity in K-12.
So, why not? We had tried the “fishbowl” process earlier in the course, but it was super difficult because (1) it was our first time; (2) the topic was very challenging; and (3) students were able to change from the inner circle to the outer circle or vice versa. Nonetheless, it was good to return back to the “fishbowl” process to try again, but change the context and “rules of the bowl.” This time, we were engaging in making “my learning” public and the inner circle and outer circle did not change. The inner circle participate in the inquiry and the outer circle observe participants and listen to the conversation in the inner circle.
Of course, I brought a “real” concern to the inner circle to start the conversation. Folks in the inner circle started to ask questions to guide my thinking on my inquiry. The participants in the inner circle were OUTSTANDING. They where honest, kind, and compassionate. They were asking questions that brought light to my implicit biases on the situation and I was very uncomfortable (and vulnerable) because they were leading me to a “truth” that I wanted to deny or was resistant to. Our class is focused on equity in schools and what the inner circle brought me to a definitive place of unlearning. For this, I am very grateful.
What a powerful process and after the “fishbowl” activity, we reflected on the process. I learned that folks in the outer circle wanted to say something, but respected the process to witness and listen to the conversation. Also, they witnessed a reflective process and “change” was happening for the public learner. The “fishbowl” process and professional learning was AMAZING and I felt supported and held by the entire class. They created space for me and essentially encouraged me to keep moving forward and not lose sight of why.
EDUC 201 exceeded my expectations and I appreciated their willingness to participate. This experience influenced how I approached my teacher education and graduate classes in the following weeks. I had more confidence in what I was doing and I could feel good about being my authentic self. The focus is about learning and what I am learning is, my perceptions, feelings, and experiences of what I think how things should be in conflict with how I would like things to be are at odds, in my mind. And even if it is true in the real-world, I need to feel clear, calm, and confident with my practice and pedagogy. It’s ok.